Project Grant: Spring 2026 Peer review participants

The peer review process relies on the time and dedication of experts across the health research spectrum. For the Spring 2026 Project Grant competition, a total of 1863 individuals (including Chairs [66], Scientific Officers [133], reviewers [1667]) participated in 66 peer review committees. There were also 128 early career researcher (ECR) Reviewers in Training present during the peer review process.

Note: Some individuals played multiple roles, such as chairing one review panel and then acting as a peer reviewer in another, which is why the role counts may not add up to 1863.

Approximately 71% (1354) of the committee members are members of the College of Reviewers, which has specific membership selection criteria. As a first step, CIHR staff provided lists of suggested reviewers based on specific selection criteria, and then reviewers were vetted by committee Chairs and Scientific Officers.

Peer review participants by sex

  Female Male Undeclared
participated 827 participated 973 participated 106 participated
invited 2455 invited to participate 2883 invited to participate 277 invited to participate
accepted 966 accepted (39.3% acceptance rate) 1182 accepted (41.0% acceptance rate) 125 accepted (45.1% acceptance rate)

The figures above exclude early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Participants by region

The following table is based on the region information of the individual's institution. The table includes all peer review participants, excluding early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Region Invited Accepted Acceptance Rate Participated
British Columbia 621 240 38.6% 210
Alberta 598 266 44.5% 220
Saskatchewan 129 56 43.4% 46
Manitoba 182 90 49.5% 74
Ontario 2218 913 41.2% 773
Québec 1501 576 38.4% 471
New Brunswick 33 12 36.4% 9
Nova Scotia 166 68 41.0% 59
Prince Edward Island 2 0 0.0% 0
Newfoundland and Labrador 45 19 42.2% 14
Yukon 1 0 0.0% 0
International 107 30 28.0% 28
No region specified 12 3 25.0% 2

Participants by pillar

The following table is based on the self-reported primary research pillar of peer review participants, excluding early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Pillar Participants Proportion
Biomedical (Pillar 1) 964 50.6%
Clinical (Pillar 2) 367 19.3%
Health Systems/Services (Pillar 3) 196 10.3%
Social/Cultural/Environmental/Population Health (Pillar 4) 190 10.0%
Uncategorized 189 9.9%

Note: The proportions of peer review participants by pillar reflect the types of applications submitted to the competition. For more information, please visit the competition results page.

Career stage of participants

The table below approximates career stages based on the start year of the peer review participants' self-reported first independent appointment. Only ECR status extensions offered by CIHR due to the COVID-19 pandemic were considered in this approximation; other eligible leaves were not considered. For more information on the ECR status extensions, see the definition of researcher (early career) in the CIHR Glossary of Funding-Related Terms.

Career Stage Invited Accepted Acceptance Rate Participated Participant proportion
Early Career Researcher 982 533 54.3% 454 23.8%
Mid Career Researcher 1459 704 48.3% 595 31.2%
Senior Career Researcher 2251 839 37.3% 712 37.4%
Unknown 923 197 21.3% 145 7.6%

The figures above exclude early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Date modified: