Project Grant: Fall 2025 Peer review participants

The peer review process relies on the time and dedication of experts across the health research spectrum. For the Fall 2025 Project Grant competition, a total of 1736 individuals (including Chairs [64], Scientific Officers [129], reviewers [1549]) participated in 66 peer review committees. There were also 131 early career researcher (ECR) Reviewers in Training present during the peer review process.

Note: Some individuals played multiple roles, such as chairing one review panel and then acting as a peer reviewer in another, which is why the role counts may not add up to 1736.

Approximately 74% (1324) of the committee members are members of the College of Reviewers, which has specific membership selection criteria. As a first step, CIHR staff provided lists of suggested reviewers based on specific selection criteria, and then reviewers were vetted by committee Chairs and Scientific Officers.

Peer review participants by sex

  Female Male Undeclared
participated 751 participated 950 participated 96 participated
invited 2117 invited to participate 2655 invited to participate 251 invited to participate
accepted 885 accepted (41.8% acceptance rate) 1128 accepted (42.5% acceptance rate) 110 accepted (43.8% acceptance rate)

The figures above exclude early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Participants by region

The following table is based on the region information of the individual's institution. The table includes all peer review participants, excluding early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Region Invited Accepted Acceptance Rate Participated
British Columbia 571 226 39.6% 196
Alberta 545 237 43.5% 209
Saskatchewan 99 43 43.4% 39
Manitoba 176 73 41.5% 65
Ontario 2015 845 41.9% 702
Québec 1299 567 43.6% 476
New Brunswick 25 5 20.0% 5
Nova Scotia 149 73 49.0% 62
Prince Edward Island 1 0 0.0% 0
Newfoundland and Labrador 47 21 44.7% 16
International 70 27 38.6% 23
No region specified 26 6 23.1% 4

Participants by pillar

The following table is based on the self-reported primary research pillar of peer review participants, excluding early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Pillar Participants Proportion
Biomedical (Pillar 1) 930 51.8%
Clinical (Pillar 2) 350 19.5%
Health Systems/Services (Pillar 3) 169 9.4%
Social/Cultural/Environmental/Population Health (Pillar 4) 180 10.0%
Uncategorized 168 9.3%

Note: The proportions of peer review participants by pillar reflect the types of applications submitted to the competition. For more information, please visit the competition results page.

Career stage of participants

The table below approximates career stages based on the start year of the peer review participants' self-reported first independent appointment. Only ECR status extensions offered by CIHR due to the COVID-19 pandemic were considered in this approximation; other eligible leaves were not considered. For more information on the ECR status extensions, see the definition of researcher (early career) in the CIHR Glossary of Funding-Related Terms.

Career Stage Invited Accepted Acceptance Rate Participated Participant proportion
Early Career Researcher 952 548 57.6% 468 26.0%
Mid Career Researcher 1338 621 46.4% 530 29.5%
Senior Career Researcher 2042 776 38.0% 665 37.0%
Unknown 691 178 25.8% 134 7.5%

The figures above exclude early career researchers who participated in the Reviewers in Training program.

Date modified: