Tri-Agency Interdisciplinary Peer Review Committee – Evaluation Criteria
Criteria | Elements | |
---|---|---|
Merit of the Proposed Research |
Quality of the Proposal |
The clarity, scope and originality of research questions and objectives |
Methods and Approaches |
Appropriateness of the proposed methods and approaches, including the integration of the interdisciplinary approaches to achieve the project goals Appropriate incorporation of sex, gender and diversity in the research design, if applicable Evidence of commitment to the development of active and meaningful partnerships with appropriate individuals and organizations, if applicable |
|
Feasibility |
Extent to which the budget is appropriate and justified in relation to the proposed activities Appropriateness of the environment (academic institution and/or other organization) to enable the conduct and success of the proposed activities |
|
Anticipated Outcomes |
Impact |
Potential for the outcomes of the proposed activities to have influence and impact |
Knowledge mobilization and dissemination |
Quality and appropriateness of knowledge mobilization plans, including effective dissemination, exchange and engagement with stakeholders within and/or beyond the research community, where applicable |
|
Training Plan |
Extent to which the proposed activities incorporate plans for the training and development of highly qualified personnel Appropriate inclusion of considerations of equity, diversity and inclusion in the training plan |
|
Applicant(s) Record |
Expertise and Experience |
Appropriate expertise to undertake the proposed research, including complementary and interdisciplinary knowledge, expertise and experience Experience and track record of the investigator(s) – importance, originality, quality and impact of past research |
Past Contribution to Training of highly qualified personnel (HQP) |
Quality and extent of past contributions to the training of HQP |
- Date modified: